Showing posts with label basketball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label basketball. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Being Held Back

"You're a full year older than me, what were you, held back as a kid?"

"What do you think about repeating this grade over again?"


When kids are growing up, they are given certain expectations to live up to.  Whether it's from their parents, their teachers, their coaches, or society in general, kids are looked upon to fill in the gaps that the older generations did not fill.  When a child is held in school, it is an indicator that that particular student needs more learning to understand the material given to them, or they are struggling too much at their current level. But after reading a couple of articles about students and parents in the current society, I'm beginning to wonder at what point parents start looking at their kids as a business instead of an expanding mind.

In the New Jersey Star Ledger, following this years NBA Draft, there were some reports about NBA prospects who had been held back in 8th grade, but no necessarily for academic reasons.  The article pointed out that many middle school basketball players are now repeating the 8th grade so that they can play like a 9th grader at an 8th grade level, thus padding their basketball stats and getting a better chance at a scholarship from a better university than their struggling counterparts, who are playing at their correct level of competition.

In fact, kids are begging their parents to be held back.

Now, I had blogged about how the education system in this country has fallen by the wayside and isn't nearly as robust as it used to be.  But I did not expect to see this kind of thing come along in our society.  I understood that colleges had scouted players in middle school and even went as far as having players and students commit to their university before entering the 8th grade.  I didn't think it would get this far.

The process goes like this: a student athlete is held back sometime in middle school, usually by a recommendation from the teaching staff, but in this case, most likely recommended by the parents.  The student-athlete gets another chance at playing middle school ball even though his body is now a full year in development ahead of the rest of the now current 8th graders.

Nerlens Noel, now an NBA player who was held back in middle school.

It is like putting a high school freshman back into his eighth grade math class and then seeing him outperform most of the students because he's already done all this work before.  Doing something the second time around does tend to be easier.  With his advanced talent and development that he has received from playing a lower level of competition, he now has made himself a visible athletic force for all the scouts watching him play.  It's like a group of 14 year old boys playing basketball with a 15 year old, people will notice which one is the 15 year old by how he's dominating the younger students.


When a scout sees this player doing as well on the court, the scout may approach the parents about a scholarship at a top-tier university.  'He seems to be outperforming his classmates, he will be great in our program, please sign on the dotted line' is what a parent might hear from a scout if they ever were encountered by one.  This is every parents dream; their kid is wanted by a great school and has the potential to have a brighter future.

Here's the surprising part: after the student moves on after 8th grade and enters high school, he can re-declare his grade-level based upon his academics.  Many parents even have private classes for their held-back students just so they can catch up and move back into the grade they were held back from, leapfrogging an entire grade if need be.  A quick side note, I did this in college when I had to take Spanish classes to complete my major requirements, so I took a test and tested out of 2 Spanish classes, thus saving me some time.  Now fast-forward to the student-athletes senior year in high school, he may be right at the age where he needs to be, or he may even be a year older.  He now has a scholarship to a top-tier university for athletics, probably has a chip on his shoulder, and without a doubt, has a much brighter future than his counterparts that weren't held back during middle school.

Something about this whole system of keeping a child back for athletic purposes doesn't seem right.  Right away, it means that the parents aren't necessarily looking out for their sons well-being as far as intelligence goes.  When you first find out about someone being held back, you think that it is because they struggled along the way or didn't grasp some concept.  It instantly becomes an indicator of potential weakness, but not in this situation.

Should parents be holding more and more of their children back if they see athletic potential in their kids?  Why is it that there is no other field that this is commonly preferred practice?  When a parent holds back a kid for academic reasons, it's because he or she didn't understand it the first time around.  No one has ever publicly stated that they held their son or daughter back in middle school so that they could get an edge in science.  It's almost as if we've put too much of an emphasis on sports, because we've incorporated them into our education system.


Here's an open ended question: do you think we would create a smarter or more gifted society if we were to allow an entire year be repeated by students.  One of the side-effects would be that there would be a huge gap between enrollment in one grade than the next.

Now I first about this from the Jalen Rose Report podcast on the Grantland Network, which can be watched and listened to here.  I did some Googling about this subject and decided that this is definitely not a common practice among young men around my neck of the woods.  I wonder if there is anything like going on other sports like Hockey or Football.  It would certainly break the whole talk about education wide open.  It's certainly a talk that we need to have in a large public forum.

Monday, February 27, 2012

JaVale McGee is the NBA Clown of the Year

In case you haven’t seen a lick of NBA action this season, or haven’t found a reason to, here’s one: JaVale McGee.  He is having the funniest season for an NBA player and might be the biggest clown in sports.  He is a great player to play along with John Wall on the Washington Wizards, but I would only pick him on my team in I needed someone to make the other players laugh hysterically.  Here are some videos of why JaVale McGee is absolutely hilarious to watch:

He gets back on defense faster than anyone else!  That takes dedication!  This seems like something that would only happen in a Youth Basketball League while parents would chuckle and say to one another “That’s my boy!”.  Now if you were making millions of dollars doing that, that’s a different story.

He goes above and beyond for making a dunk for the fans!  He knows he is a star and wants to make fans love him.  What better way than to attempt a Jordan-esque dunk in a game, not once, but TWICE!  Pure dedication to giving the fans a good time!

Back to defense!  No matter if the ball is about to go in, JaVale McGee will swat that thing to the 10th row back like an Olympic Volleyball player.  The look on the girls face when the ball is going back to the court says it all.  No one is safe from JaVale’s blocks.  Even the people sitting far away on purpose.

Who wouldn’t want to be around a guy who planks on a moving sidewalk at the Hong Kong airport?  This man might be on the list for best comedian of the year.  Forget Zach Galifianakis, Louis CK, and whoever else you might think is funny, JaVale McGee is in the running!

Even the Washington Wizards administrators on are board with JaVale McGee being the center of comedic attention.  I can’t think of anything that would escalate McGee’s presence in the NBA.  He would have to go campaigning for Obama.  Or even better: Mitt Romney!  I can’t even describe what future this man has in store for himself.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Why Rondo for Paul doesn’t make sense

So the Boston sports media thinks that Rajon Rondo will get traded to the New Orleans Hornets for Chris Paul.  I laughed at this and then realized, "shit, someone is actually serious".  That someone is probably former Celtic GM genius turned mad man with trading power Danny Ainge.  I don’t think he is all there upstairs anymore.  He traded our starting center for 6th/7th man, during a playoff run and then tried to defend it.  Someone should have told him there are 5 good centers in the league and we had one.  But, before I rant on that, here are some videos of why we shouldn't trade Rondo for Paul.

Video #1:

Rondo is as tough as they come.  Coming back into the game after something crazy like this happens?  Who does this?  Plus I think people underestimated Dwayne Wade for physically taking Boston out of the game at this point by losing their passer.  Rondo gets injured and yet is back before the end of the game.

#2:   Chris Paul is very prone to injury.  This is just a head collision, but let's let the next picture signify what our future "running point guard” will be wearing along with a uniform.

That my friends is a full on knee brace.  Meaning he has had knee surgery.  Meaning he isn't nearly as fast or is going to be able to keep up with players that will be guarding him.  Point guards need to have perfect running ability and not knee injuries of any kind. 

#3.  Didn’t think there would be something like this one Youtube, but then again, what isn’t out there.

Not so sure that Chris Paul would be a psychological fit for the Big 3.  This trade wouldn’t make anyone better.

#4:  I don't think I need to say anything more that what this next video says.  Pure hustle.  You can't show hustle on a statistic, you can only see it.

 

Some skeptics think Rondo is only good around players that are Hall of Famers.  If that is the case than Rondo should be considered one of the players that would be a building block for players that are elite.  Pierce, Allen and mainly Garnett were the rocks that the Celtics built their championship hopes on.  They made it as far as they could, winning a championship one year and losing in the finals another and for some reason trading their starting center for a 6th man within the last year, wiping away all hopes for a possible return to the Finals and leaving a bad taste in every Celtics fan’s mouth.

If Danny Ainge plans to return to the Finals, he needs to find the right building blocks to rebuild his team.  Having a point guard that primarily scores wouldn’t be the same as a point guard who primarily passes.  It’s more important for a team to have the guys that don’t make a ton of mistakes than the guys that are going to put up to high standards.  If the Celtics were to keep Rondo, we’d need to have find the replacements for Garnett, Pierce, and Allen.  If we trade Rondo, I’d at least want someone that moves the ball just as well as Rondo did.  Paul isn’t that guy.  The Celtics can’t afford another player whose going to want a max deal, seeing that we have a hometown bargain (Pierce) and a max deal (Garnett).  I think the Celtics needs are in the Center position and in the area of bench players.  Particularly bench players who aren’t overweight and who can make it seem like there wasn’t a substitution in the first place.  More developments will come from this later, but I still think Rajon Rondo is a cheap point guard who moves the ball and is the emotional center of the team right now.